Loading...

Table of Content

    01 October 2016, Volume 2 Issue 4
    Introduction to Special Issue
    Arland Thornton and Yu Xie
    2016, 2(4):  479-482.  doi:10.1177/2057150X16670829
    Asbtract ( 140 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    The six articles in this special issue focus attention on the dissemination of DI around the world, with particular emphasis on China. These papers cover a wide range of issues, including how people in different areas of the world conceptualize and use the concept of development and global international hierarchies, how the attributes of individuals and communities affect perceptions of developmental hierarchies, and how people place China in that global hierarchy. These papers also examine how people conceptualize DI beliefs concerning the consequences and causes of development and the reliability and stability of DI measurement at the individual level.

    Developmental idealism in China
    Arland Thornton and Yu Xie
    2016, 2(4):  483-496.  doi:10.1177/2057150X16670835
    Asbtract ( 144 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    This paper examines the intersection of developmental idealism with China. It discusses how developmental idealism has been widely disseminated within China and has had enormous effects on public policy and programs, on social institutions, and on the lives of individuals and their families. This dissemination of developmental idealism to China began in the 19th century, when China met with several military defeats that led many in the country to question the place of China in the world. By the beginning of the 20th century, substantial numbers of Chinese had reacted to the country’s defeats by exploring developmental idealism as a route to independence, international respect, and prosperity. Then, with important but brief aberrations, the country began to implement many of the elements of developmental idealism, a movement that became especially important following the assumption of power by the Communist Party of China in 1949. This movement has played a substantial role in politics, in the economy, and in family life. The beliefs and values of developmental idealism have also been directly disseminated to the grassroots in China, where substantial majorities of Chinese citizens have assimilated them. These ideas are both known and endorsed by very large numbers in China today.

    The perception of global hierarchies: South-Eastern European patterns in comparative perspectives
    Attila Melegh, Tamás Kiss, Sabina Csánóová, Linda Young-DeMarco, Arland Thornton
    2016, 2(4):  497-523.  doi:10.1177/2057150X16670836
    Asbtract ( 126 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    In this paper we examine the views of ordinary people in Hungary and Romania about developmental trajectories and developmental hierarchies. Our work extends research on perception of global hierarchies as we include the views of ordinary people in the countries of Hungary and Romania. In addition, our research makes a unique contribution to the development and developmental hierarchy literature by examining, for the first time, how individuals define development. Although the main focus of this paper is the developmental views of Hungarians and Romanians, at times we add to our discussion results from a survey in Bulgaria and another from Albania. In this paper we conclude that developmental models are widespread among ordinary people in Hungary and Romania; we also find that the South-East European region does show some specificities in terms of the over- and under-positioning of certain countries relative to the dominant international rating system. China and, to a lesser degree, Russia were over-positioned by respondents relative to the developmental index scores of those countries. Within the region, unlike Bulgarians and Albanians, who severely underrated themselves, Hungarian and Romanian respondents put themselves in a middle position on the developmental scale. Concerning developmental items with some differences between the two countries, our data show that the economy is the most important development criterion in the minds of Hungarians and Romanians, followed by democracy, science and technology, and education.

    Universal, yet local: The religious factor in Chinese Muslims' perception of world developmental hierarchy
    Qing Lai and Zheng Mu
    2016, 2(4):  524-546.  doi:10.1177/2057150X16674126
    Asbtract ( 76 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    Since its introduction in the late 19th century, developmental thinking has quickly diffused throughout Chinese society. Nowadays, Chinese people extensively employ the concept of development to understand different countries in hierarchical order. Using survey data collected in Gansu, China, we confirmed the nearly universal existence of such developmental worldviews. Overall, our respondents’ perceptions conformed to the United Nations’ developmental hierarchy based on the Human Development Index scores. However, local Muslims tended to deviate slightly more than other Chinese from the UN standard. This does not mean that Chinese Muslims were reluctant to adopt developmental thinking. In fact, in their eyes, developmental ideas have been prominently associated with Islam since the beginning of the 20th century. Our analysis shows that the observed Muslim–Han disparity is entirely due to Muslims’ higher evaluations of development in countries with strongly Islamic populations – in this case, Pakistan. Other than this religion-based disparity, Gansu Muslims and local Han Chinese do not differ in their perceptions of the world developmental hierarchy.

    Perceptions of developmental hierarchies in Taiwan: Conceptual, substantive, and methodological insights
    Arland Thornton, Li-shou Yang
    2016, 2(4):  547-576.  doi:10.1177/2057150X16670831
    Asbtract ( 207 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    Motivated by a growing awareness of the penetration of developmental idealism into the daily lives of ordinary people, this paper analyzes Taiwanese college students’ perceptions of developmental hierarchies, a key element of developmental idealism. We investigate the extent to which Taiwanese students hold hierarchical views of the world, whether these views match the views of the United Nations, the stability of these views across time, and the reliability of measurement. Data for this paper come from the survey of 'Political Values and Attitudes among University Students in Taiwan,' a panel study conducted by the Election Study Center in Taipei, Taiwan. Our results from this panel study conducted in 2006, 2007, and 2008 show that Taiwanese students have worldviews that include developmental hierarchies that are very similar to the country development ratings of the United Nations. We show that these perceptions of developmental hierarchies can be measured reliably at both the individual and the aggregate levels and are stable across the survey years.

    Chinese and world cultural models of developmental hierarchy
    Shawn F Dorius
    2016, 2(4):  577-608.  doi:10.1177/2057150X16670832
    Asbtract ( 104 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    Prior research on cultural models of developmental hierarchy finds broad cross-national agreement among publics about the rank ordering of societies on perceived level of development, based on an omnibus measure of development. In this research, I use a multidimensional index of world hierarchy derived from subjective evaluations of a large number of national attributes to explore dimensionality in Chinese perceptions of global hierarchy. Statistical analysis show that the data exhibit over time stability and strong association with objective measures of development and with alternate subjective measures of world hierarchy. Irrespective of the national attributes evaluated, Chinese respondents produced a very similar rank-ordering of countries on each of six different indexes. The Chinese model of world hierarchy shows broad overlap with the global hierarchy produced by raters from 19 other surveyed publics. Notable differences between Chinese and world cultural models of hierarchy include especially negative views of Japan, South Korea, Indonesia and India among Chinese respondents, and unusually favorable opinions of Russia, relative to the ratings of these countries by other publics. Analyses also show that respondents from 19 societies ranked China higher on the cultural dimension than on any other dimension but ranked the Chinese government lower than all but one country. Results suggest that scales based on an omnibus subjective measure of developmental hierarchy and indexes based on subjective ratings of national attributes produce a similar world hierarchy of nations.

    Evaluating the measurement reliabilities and dimensionality of developmental idealism measures
    Arland Thornton, Georgina Binstock, Linda Young-DeMarco, Colter Mitchell, Kathryn M. Yount and Yu Xie
    2016, 2(4):  609-635.  doi:10.1177/2057150X16672813
    Asbtract ( 179 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    This paper investigates the measurement of developmental idealism. Developmental idealism is a set of beliefs and values stating that modern societies and families are better than traditional societies and families, that modern families facilitate modern societies, and that modern societies foster modern families. Prior research has shown that developmental idealism is widespread globally but has provided little evidence about whether beliefs concerning developmental idealism can be measured reliably at the individual level. It also has provided little information about the dimensionality and psychometric properties of measures of developmental idealism. Using cross-sectional survey data from Argentina, China, and Egypt, we explore and test the factor structure underlying observed measures for aspects of developmental idealism and estimate the reliability of different models. Theory and data suggest that developmental idealism consists of multiple dimensions, and when family-related items are measuring similar underlying constructs, the measurement reliabilities are high. These results provide evidence that the dimensions of developmental idealism can be measured with a high degree of reliability.