Abstract:

Based on perspectives of organizational mobilization, action strategy and political opportunity structure, this study systematically examines the effects of five factors — type of dispute, number of participants, rights-defending method, homeowners' organization, and government response — on the results of homeowners' collective actions by analyzing data collected from 191 cases of homeowners' rights protection activities that took place in China between 1999 and 2012. Findings include the following: (1) in administrative disputes and mixed disputes which involve government departments, homeowners are less likely to successfully protect their interests than in other types of disputes; (2) mobilizing a certain number of participants is conducive to homeowners achieving a satisfactory result, but this does not mean that the more participants are mobilized, the more likely they are to succeed in a collective protest; (3) different kinds of rights protection methods and their combinations influence the results of homeowners' rights-defending activities; (4) non-institutionalized radical actions do not help homeowners to realize their claims; (5) a well-functioning homeowners' organization which truly represents the interests of homeowners can significantly increase the success rate of a homeowners' collective action; and (6) government maladministration (improper intervention or administrative nonfeasance) severely hinders homeowners from successfully defending their legitimate rights and interests. These findings confirm the reality of a strong state and weak society in contemporary China.

Key words: Community dispute, homeowners' collective action, organizational mobilization, action strategy, political opportunity structure