Loading...

Table of Content

    01 October 2017, Volume 3 Issue 4
    Cumulative adversity, childhood behavioral problems, and educational mobility in China's poorest rural communities
    Wensong Shen, Li-Chung Hu and Emily Hannum
    2017, 3(4):  491-517.  doi:10.1177/2057150X17736664
    Asbtract ( 214 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    Behavioral problems are recognized as playing a potentially important role in educational attainment, but their function in contexts of extreme poverty is not well understood. In such settings, other factors might swamp any effects of children's behavioral problems. Further, the interpretation of behavioral problems in circumstances of deep poverty is not clear: problematic behaviors might be in part a direct function of adverse experiences in childhood. In this paper, we focus on the case of 2000 rural youth sampled in the year 2000 from 100 villages in Gansu, one of China's poorest provinces, and followed up through 2015. We investigate whether behavioral problems—internalizing problems, externalizing problems, and teacher-reported behavior problems—predict subsequent educational attainment among the rural poor, and consider the contributions of cumulative adversity to behavioral problems. Results in a highpoverty context where promotion decisions are closely tied to performance show that behavioral factors are linked to long-term educational outcomes. These results are robust to adjustment for a host of individual, family, and community context variables. There is some evidence that children in higher socioeconomic status families and in more developed communities are less vulnerable to experiencing behavioral problems. While girls are slightly less vulnerable to experiencing teacher-reported behavior problems than boys, there is no gender difference in the implications of behavioral problems for educational attainment. Finally, behavioral problems do not appear to operate simply as a proxy for measured family adversity.

    Spontaneous cognitive liberation in the context of rights-defending actions: A case study of the evolution of homeowner activists' rights consciousness
    Xiaoyi Sun and Ronggui Huang
    2017, 3(4):  518-547.  doi:10.1177/2057150X17737458
    Asbtract ( 193 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    Empirical studies on Chinese homeowners' activism regarding defending their rights focus mostly on either political opportunities or resource mobilization and often neglect the cognitive process of homeowner activists in developing their rights consciousness. This study attempts to use the perspective of framing and cognitive liberation to gain a nuanced understanding of activists' subjective cognition in their actions aimed at defending their rights. An analytic framework is proposed which examines two aspects of homeowners' rights consciousness: the referent of rights (property rights versus rights to self-governance) and the nature of rights (reactive versus proactive). Data were collected from Sina Weibo tweets posted by homeowner activists in the period 2011 to 2015. The results show that activists are universally aware of property rights and are increasingly proactive in seeking self-governance. Subsequent interviews of a group of activists revealed a spontaneous and interactive process of cognitive liberation that derives from both the first-hand experiences and the online discussions with fellow activists. Social media provide platforms upon which activists can exchange information, form networks, and learn from each other about common issues and obstacles and, thus, they promote collective consciousness and facilitate cognitive liberation. This suggests that future studies of activism regarding homeowners' defence of rights should shift from an event-centered case study approach to an issue-centered analysis of the grass-roots rights movement as a whole.

    Organizational mobilization, action strategy and opportunity structure: Factors affecting the results of homeowners' collective actions
    Zhiming Sheng
    2017, 3(4):  548-580.  doi:10.1177/2057150X17721851
    Asbtract ( 310 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    Based on perspectives of organizational mobilization, action strategy and political opportunity structure, this study systematically examines the effects of five factors — type of dispute, number of participants, rights-defending method, homeowners' organization, and government response — on the results of homeowners' collective actions by analyzing data collected from 191 cases of homeowners' rights protection activities that took place in China between 1999 and 2012. Findings include the following: (1) in administrative disputes and mixed disputes which involve government departments, homeowners are less likely to successfully protect their interests than in other types of disputes; (2) mobilizing a certain number of participants is conducive to homeowners achieving a satisfactory result, but this does not mean that the more participants are mobilized, the more likely they are to succeed in a collective protest; (3) different kinds of rights protection methods and their combinations influence the results of homeowners' rights-defending activities; (4) non-institutionalized radical actions do not help homeowners to realize their claims; (5) a well-functioning homeowners' organization which truly represents the interests of homeowners can significantly increase the success rate of a homeowners' collective action; and (6) government maladministration (improper intervention or administrative nonfeasance) severely hinders homeowners from successfully defending their legitimate rights and interests. These findings confirm the reality of a strong state and weak society in contemporary China.

    Caught between ideal and reality: A study on occupational burnout among inside-system legal professionals under the rule-of-law reform in contemporary China
    Xiangyang Bi
    2017, 3(4):  581-613.  doi:10.1177/2057150X17736482
    Asbtract ( 253 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    This paper analyzes job burnout of inside-system legal professionals under the rule-of-law reform in China and its possible causes. Social cognitive theory, including cognitive dissonance, expectancy theory, and social comparison theory, provides the analytic framework for this study. The conclusion reveals a relatively high level of job burnout among insidesystem legal professionals in China. Further analysis indicates that the individual's commitment to the rule of law, confidence in the legal reform, and practice of non-rule-of-law in daily work are influential factors affecting his/her job burnout levels. Importantly, the interaction coefficients between these variables are statistically significant, clearly demonstrating that the discrepancy between expectation and reality is one of the root causes of job burnout in the legal profession. The discrepancy causes cognitive dissonance and psychological imbalance. At a theoretical level, this finding opens a new way of examining a particular type of occupational burnout. It shows that under the rule-of-law reform, Chinese inside-system legal professionals exhibit cognitive dissonance between ideals and reality, which constitutes a micro-political psychological basis for organizational change as speculated by neo-institutionalists and, in turn, reveals insights that may help us to understand the legal reform process within the bureaucratic system.

    From macro-state to meso-organizing: A sociological review of the transition of Chinese local governments in the past 30 years
    Liangfei Ye
    2017, 3(4):  614-640.  doi:10.1177/2057150X17733654
    Asbtract ( 221 )   PDF  
    Related Articles | Metrics

    Studying the transition of Chinese local governments has continuously been the main theme for sociologists since the fiscal, administrative, and market reforms launched in the 1980s. In reference to other countries' experience, sociological studies about this transition are generally from three macro-theoretical perspectives: Weberian modernity, local transitional state, and local developmental state. However, they have two common problems: first, perceiving the transition as a paradigm shift, not a process; and, second, perceiving local governments as static entities, without internal dynamics. As an alternative, the paper argues that a meso-theoretical perspective should be adopted to inductively study the organization of Chinese local governments in the transitional process. Through exploring the two schools of the meso-organizing perspective—'structuralism' and 'agency with plural institutions'—the paper proposes that sociologists should explore the transition as a dynamic process, an open system, an interaction of 'structuralism' and 'agency with plural institutions', and with an internal perspective.